Home | Blogs | The Mock Blog | Global Warming Conspiracy Confirmed

Global Warming Conspiracy Confirmed

Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font
Global Warming Conspiracy Confirmed


In the seventies a very important government document was leaked to the public at great risk but was instrumental in bringing a close to the Viet Nam war.  The document showed the government knew the war was never going to produce the expected results and that the entire ideology of the war was incorrect.  Last week a set of documents were made public that could very well have a similar effect on the theory of Global Warming.
Early in the week of Nov. 15 over four thousand emails and documents held at University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit in England were made public by some unknown source.  Within and among many other incriminating emails were some between Keith Briffa, Tim Osborn and Research Director Phil Jones, which suggested they conspired to hide, withhold and delete publically financed data sets which they and many others used to produce the famous graph of rising global temperatures published extensively by the United Nations and dramatically by Al Gore in "An Inconvenient Truth" showing an alarming warming trend in the world climate.
Statistician Steve McIntyre, mentioned by name in Jones' emails, has now been vindicated in his 'years old battle' by this news, since he has been asking in untold numbers of ways for this withheld data since 2003.  He has suggested that scientists have been using only a small subset of the available data to make their claims that recent years have been the hottest of the last millennium. When the entire data set is used, Mr. McIntyre claims that the sudden upward swing of this centuries rise in global temperatures (hockey stick shape) disappears completely. (Yamal: A “Divergence” Problem, by Steve McIntyre, 27 September 2009
This evidence alone is enough to put climate science on notice and leading UK environmentalist George Monbiot of London's Guardian newspaper concedes:
"It's no use pretending this isn't a major blow. The emails extracted by a hacker from the climatic research unit at the University of East Anglia could scarcely be more damaging. I am now convinced that they are genuine, and I'm dismayed and deeply shaken by them.

Yes, the messages were obtained illegally. Yes, all of us say things in emails that would be excruciating if made public. Yes, some of the comments have been taken out of context. But there are some messages that require no spin to make them look bad. There appears to be evidence here of attempts to prevent scientific data from being released, and even to destroy material that was subject to a freedom of information request.

Worse still, some of the emails suggest efforts to prevent the publication of work by climate skeptics, or to keep it out of a report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. I believe that the head of the unit, Phil Jones, should now resign."
But when the dust settles this conspiracy will revel a low standard in the 'climate change' moral high ground, and may include several scientific establishments including the prestigious American organization of "Nature" and "Science" among many more who refused or failed to reinforce the scientific discipline necessary to insure integrity of the scientific community.
And furthermore as proof that the major news agencies are also suspect in this conspiracy you are invited to analyze any of them that actually report this huge story in the coming days even though it's already over a week old.  The significance of this issue should not be withheld until it simply cannot be hidden any longer, or distorted into a political issue concerning 'timing' etc, which seems to be the case so far.  As a matter of fact there is strong evidence the British Broadcast Corporation has had these emails since early October!  Paul Hudson, weather presenter and climate change expert of the BBC, admitted he was sent the leaked emails more than a month before they were made public.
This kind of pervasive conspiracy may be unbelievable to you, but if you simply go and look for this devastating issue in you favorite news source and then watch it develop you will be witness to it's process of spin and deceit depending on your source. 
This sort of conspiracy is not new.  The science of gravity and our solar system suffered for years because Galileo was suppressed by politics in the fifteenth century.  We are now witnessing another huge historical milestone of science.  All you have to do is notice that the truth is the first victim.  Armed with this knowledge you will see first hand how the media leads us astray from the truth.
Don't forget, these documents are only a week or so in the public domain.  The dominoes are just beginning to fall so this could be a very interesting story.  There are thousands of people digging through this material and putting the evidence together.  And already some members of the Australian and British and American governments are reacting.
Perhaps as a result of this new development in climate science scandal a similar incident is taking place in New Zealand.  The New Zealand Climate Science Coalition has recently made a surprising discovery.  The New Zealand's National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research (NIWA) temperature data available to anyone who cares to download it, shows conflict with the graph officially offered as coming from that data!  While the official graph shows linear trend from 1909 to 2008 of warming 0.92°C per 100 years.  The graph plotted by anyone from the raw data shows a trend statistically insignificant at 0.06°C per century.  What's going on they asked.
"We compared raw data for each station (from NIWA’s web site) with the adjusted official data, which we obtained from one of Dr Salinger’s colleagues.  Requests for this information from Dr Salinger himself over the years, by different scientists, have long gone unanswered, but now we might discover the truth.

There are no reasons for any large corrections. But we were astonished to find that strong adjustments have indeed been made.

About half the adjustments actually created a warming trend where none existed; the other half greatly exaggerated existing warming. All the adjustments increased or even created a warming trend, with only one (Dunedin) going the other way and slightly reducing the original trend.

The shocking truth is that the oldest readings have been cranked way down and later readings artificially lifted to give a false impression of warming, as documented below. There is nothing in the station histories to warrant these adjustments and to date Dr Salinger and NIWA have not revealed why they did this."

A pdf file of this study can be read here: http://nzclimatescience.net/images/PDFs/global_warming_nz2.pdf

And here in the US: November 25, 2009; Notices of Intent to File Suit against NASA and its Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), for those bodies’ refusal – for nearly three years – to provide documents requested under the Freedom of Information Act.

Jay Mock
248 Flume Creek
Sandpoint, Idaho 83864
"Hell is truth seen too late... duty neglected in its season." --Tryon Edwards
"Real education must ultimately be limited to men who insist on knowing, the rest is mere sheep-herding." -Ezra Pound


Subscribe to comments feed Comments (0 posted)

total: | displaying:

Post your comment

  • Bold
  • Italic
  • Underline
  • Quote

Please enter the code you see in the image:

  • Email to a friend Email to a friend
  • Print version Print version
  • Plain text Plain text

Author info

Jay Mock Jay Mock

Tagged as:

No tags for this article

Rate this article